Economic uncertainty can place enormous pressure on businesses, but financial difficulty does not remove an employer’s responsibility to respect the legal rights of employees.
That principle was at the heart of comments made in 2010 by Ahmad Abdulla Ahli, whose name was reported by Emirates 24|7 at the time as Ahmad Abdulla Hussain and Judge Ahmad Hussain, while he was serving as Chief of the Labour Court in Dubai.
In an Emirates 24|7 report published on 31 July 2010, the Dubai Labour Court addressed a significant increase in employment disputes during a period when businesses across the region were still dealing with the effects of the global economic downturn.
The message from the court was clear: genuine economic difficulties may contribute to employment disputes, but companies should not use a downturn as an excuse to dismiss employees without paying what they are legally owed.
Labour Cases Rise in Dubai
According to the report, the number of labour cases before Dubai Courts increased by approximately 50 per cent during the first half of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009.
At first glance, such an increase might have been attributed almost entirely to the economic crisis.
However, Ahmad Abdulla Ahli explained that the reality was more complicated.
The economic downturn itself accounted for only part of the increase in labour disputes. Another portion was linked to businesses that, according to the court’s experience at the time, were using the difficult economic environment as justification for terminating employees without properly settling their employment dues.
This distinction was important.
A company experiencing genuine financial difficulty and a profitable business using an economic downturn as a convenient explanation for withholding employee rights are very different situations.
Economic Difficulty Does Not Eliminate Employee Rights
One of the most significant points raised in the report concerned businesses that remained commercially active and profitable but nevertheless dismissed employees without paying their entitlements.
Ahmad Abdulla Ahli gave practical examples to illustrate the issue.
Certain businesses, such as popular restaurants or shops serving broad sections of the population, might continue to generate substantial business despite the wider economic slowdown.
The fact that the economy was experiencing difficulties did not automatically establish that every business had suffered financial losses.
For the Labour Court, therefore, each employment dispute needed to be assessed according to its actual circumstances rather than accepting the economic downturn as a general explanation for non-payment.
The broader principle remains important: employment obligations arise from law and the employment relationship, and they cannot simply be disregarded because economic conditions have become more challenging.
A Firm Approach to Workers’ Dues
Ahmad Abdulla Ahli emphasised that the Labour Court gave priority to resolving employment disputes quickly so that workers could obtain their rights without unnecessary delay.
According to the 2010 report, the court was working toward resolving cases within a relatively short period and coordinating with other government authorities to ensure that judgments were implemented.
The report also highlighted a firm approach toward employers that failed to cooperate with enforcement procedures.
The underlying judicial position was straightforward: workers’ legitimate rights and unpaid dues were matters requiring effective enforcement, not merely court judgments that existed on paper.
This focus on enforcement is particularly important in employment disputes.
For a worker who has lost a job, obtaining a favourable judgment is only part of the process. The practical value of that judgment depends on whether the employee is actually able to recover the amounts awarded.
Reconciliation Before Litigation
Another important feature of the Dubai Labour Court system discussed by Ahmad Abdulla Ahli was the use of reconciliation.
At the time, several judges were assigned to attempt amicable settlements between employers and employees before disputes proceeded through the full judicial process.
This approach had practical advantages for both sides.
A properly negotiated settlement could:
resolve the dispute more quickly;
reduce litigation costs;
allow an employee to obtain payment sooner;
reduce the administrative burden on the courts; and
avoid prolonged conflict between the parties.
According to the report, reconciliation procedures successfully resolved a substantial proportion of labour disputes.
This demonstrated that litigation did not necessarily have to be the first or only solution to an employment conflict.
Where both parties understood their legal positions and were prepared to negotiate reasonably, settlement could often produce a more efficient outcome.
The Employer’s Responsibility to Produce Evidence
The Emirates 24|7 report also highlighted an important evidentiary issue in labour disputes.
Employees do not always have access to the same documents and financial records as their employers.
Salary records, payment documents, employment files and other evidence may remain under the employer’s control.
Ahmad Abdulla Ahli explained that where payment of employment dues was disputed, the employer could be required to produce documents demonstrating that the employee had in fact been paid.
This reflected the practical realities of employment relationships.
An employee may know that salary, gratuity, commission or another entitlement has not been received, but the employer is often in a stronger position to produce formal payroll and accounting records.
The court’s approach therefore recognised the imbalance that can exist between employers and individual workers.
Commission Disputes Can Be Particularly Complex
The report also identified commission-related disputes as among the more complicated labour cases.
For many employees, remuneration is not limited to a fixed monthly salary.
A compensation package may include commissions, incentives or other variable payments linked to performance or sales.
When the employment relationship ends, disagreements can arise over whether commission is payable, how it should be calculated and what transactions should be included.
Ahmad Abdulla Ahli explained that expert assistance could be required in such disputes to determine the employee’s correct entitlement.
This remains a useful lesson for both employers and employees.
Clear employment contracts, accurate records and transparent commission structures can significantly reduce the likelihood of disputes later.
Avoiding Exaggerated Employment Claims
The 2010 report also contained a warning about exaggerated claims.
Ahmad Abdulla Ahli criticised situations in which claims for employment entitlements were inflated beyond what was genuinely due.
Such practices can make settlement more difficult and prolong litigation.
For employees, claiming legitimate entitlements accurately is generally more effective than pursuing unrealistic amounts that cannot be supported by evidence or law.
For employers, maintaining proper records is equally important because documentary evidence can make it much easier to demonstrate what has already been paid and what remains outstanding.
Access to Justice for Workers
One of the most notable aspects of the interview was the court’s concern for workers who might not have the financial resources to pursue their cases.
Termination of employment can place an individual under immediate financial pressure.
A worker may simultaneously face loss of income, accommodation concerns, visa issues and unpaid benefits.
The report described measures intended to ensure that genuine claimants were still able to pursue their rights even where financial resources were limited.
Ahmad Abdulla Ahli also stressed that workers should not assume that every labour dispute necessarily requires expensive legal representation.
The emphasis was on making the dispute-resolution system accessible and ensuring that legitimate employment claims could be heard and enforced.
Judicial Experience in Labour Law
The Emirates 24|7 interview provides an important historical insight into Ahmad Abdulla Ahli’s judicial career.
Before entering private legal practice, he served for many years within Dubai’s judicial system and held senior responsibilities across different areas of law.
His role as Chief of the Labour Court placed him directly at the centre of employment disputes involving salaries, termination, commissions, end-of-service benefits and other workplace rights.
The experience also required balancing two important considerations: protecting employees from unlawful practices while ensuring that disputes were resolved according to evidence and established legal principles.
That judicial background later became part of the experience he brought into private legal practice.
A Principle That Remains Relevant
Economic conditions change.
Businesses expand, contract and sometimes face genuine financial difficulties.
But one principle illustrated by the 2010 Labour Court discussion remains important: difficult economic circumstances should not automatically become a justification for disregarding employment rights.
Employers should maintain proper employment and payment records, comply with applicable labour obligations and deal transparently with employees when restructuring or terminating employment.
Employees, meanwhile, should understand their contractual and legal entitlements and maintain records relating to salary, commissions, correspondence and payments.
The observations made by Ahmad Abdulla Ahli while serving as Chief of the Labour Court provide an insight into the practical challenges faced by Dubai’s employment judiciary during a difficult economic period — and into the importance placed on resolving labour disputes fairly, efficiently and with proper regard for workers’ lawful entitlements.
Source: Emirates 24|7, “Downturn an excuse for sacking without dues,” published 31 July 2010. The original report refers to Ahmad Abdulla Ahli under the names “Ahmad Abdulla Hussain” and “Judge Ahmad Hussain.”
.png "Leading lawyers in Dubai 2026 and UAE legal experts by practice area")
.png)